cognitivedissonance:

swamandsank:

feministbecky:

stfufauxminists:

fsufeminist:

goddamnitreddas:

reallyfoxnews:

Fox News headline v. real headline of the day: sexist edition.

As far as the lady folk go, according to Fox Newsers, feminine is synonymous with pretty and this study is somehow relevant to politics!

why the fuck did they spend money to study this

who the fuck why is this ugh

This is definitely super important information to have about women politicians.

Super important

We should do a study to see which political group has the more handsome men. AMIRIGHT?

I’m going to look at this study from a different angle: Does this mean the Democratic Party is more accepting of women in power who don’t fit a traditionally feminine stereotype, while the Republican Party is chock full of women who likely wouldn’t be powerful within the party’s structure without fitting said mold?

Survey says….

Why is this important? Well, the grand scheme of things, it seems not. However, it can tell us another piece of information regarding the voting patterns of people who are liberal or conservative, how physical appearance and gender role conformity affects political success (for better or worse), and the differences in gender role perception among voters on the spectrum of gender and political ideology etc. 

That said, Fox Nation is pretty much the worst ever with headlines.

Paid spokesmodels do tend to be quite pretty. Ability to understand a newspaper is completely optional, and probably not helpful when you’re just supposed to read the script the guys give you.

(via iamheathen)

  1. me-and-other-freaks-of-nature reblogged this from midshipmankennedy
  2. karmaofmytits reblogged this from stfufauxminists
  3. idontcareimjustinspired reblogged this from stfufauxminists and added:
    I read various articles and studies about this, it was utterly amusing.
  4. illestrin reblogged this from theblueboxonbakerstreet
  5. doctor-sherlock-winchester reblogged this from jackrosejackrose
  6. heir-of-death reblogged this from niightwing
  7. jackrosejackrose reblogged this from chandelure
  8. dieboredom reblogged this from iamnotasupernaturalcreature
  9. iamnotasupernaturalcreature reblogged this from dingdongyouarewrong
  10. niightwing reblogged this from tweety192
  11. tweety192 reblogged this from time-crawls-on
  12. dingdongyouarewrong reblogged this from surfsup-shinjikun
  13. fluoriteoctet reblogged this from 5mut
  14. nocturnalemisson reblogged this from canterberrytales
  15. alaspooralice reblogged this from canterberrytales
  16. canterberrytales reblogged this from 5mut
  17. 5mut reblogged this from rufflet
  18. chandelure reblogged this from rufflet
  19. rufflet reblogged this from reallyfoxnews
  20. neatocheeto reblogged this from acceptablecannibalism
  21. deluxeyellowflower reblogged this from acceptablecannibalism
  22. revoltagainstfate reblogged this from margheritaaville
  23. margheritaaville reblogged this from gingeritt
  24. kelsonikole reblogged this from theblueboxonbakerstreet
  25. missnomer reblogged this from theblueboxonbakerstreet
  26. please-be-a-dream reblogged this from acceptablecannibalism
  27. varthandi reblogged this from theblueboxonbakerstreet
  28. paper-cats reblogged this from dittolicous
  29. dittolicous reblogged this from into-the-time-vortex
  30. into-the-time-vortex reblogged this from theblueboxonbakerstreet
  31. acceptablecannibalism reblogged this from theblueboxonbakerstreet
  32. mystkamm reblogged this from theblueboxonbakerstreet
  33. theblueboxonbakerstreet reblogged this from lipsredasroses
  34. adan1love reblogged this from stayandchewthefat
  35. queeriesandmore reblogged this from theburgerkhaleesi
  36. andwidenedeyes reblogged this from reallyfoxnews and added:
    hmmm maybe beause idk they have to appeal to sexist patriarchal pieces of shit to get taken (somewhat) seriously and...
  37. trulybadtiming reblogged this from dionthesocialist